theam/fullstack-dev-kit
Issue-to-PR workflow for any tech stack: fetch stories from Jira/Linear/GitHub/Azure and Figma designs, plan-approval gate, adaptive quality + coverage gates, e2e generation, PR creation and review.
Run the repo's unit tests with coverage and verify that every file touched in the current change keeps line, branch, and function coverage at or above 95%. Language- and framework-agnostic. Use before committing, before PR creation, or when the user asks about coverage.
Create a branch, commit the work, and open a pull request for a completed user story, after all quality gates pass. Use when the user asks to open/create a PR or as the final step of the story workflow.
Delegate an approved backlog to a real async coding agent (GitHub Copilot coding agent) so several stories are worked in parallel — one branch and PR per issue — then re-apply the kit's quality via pr-review/fix-pr on the resulting PRs. The async, throughput-first alternative to running work-story interactively per story. Verifies the async target exists (never fabricates a trigger) and never auto-merges. Use when a PO/dev wants to fan a backlog out to an async agent.
First-use bootstrap for the dev kit. Detects the team's issue tracker, discovers what it can via MCP/CLI, asks only what cannot be discovered, and persists the result to .claude/dev-kit.json in the consuming repo. Use when that file is missing, when the user asks to set up or reconfigure the kit, or when issue-fetch cannot resolve its configuration.
Create or update end-to-end tests for a user-facing flow that changed, using whatever e2e framework the repo already uses. Use after implementing a user story that alters UI behavior, routing, forms, or API-driven views.
Extract frame/component structure and all visible text from a Figma design URL. Use whenever a prompt or a fetched issue contains a figma.com/design or figma.com/file link.
Resolve the findings on an existing pull request - review comments, CI failures, and self-review findings - driving each to a decision (fix / defer to a tracked issue / discard), re-verifying the gates, replying to each reviewer, and watching for late feedback. The counterpart to pr-review that closes the loop.
Turn the loose ends a finished story leaves — out-of-scope notes, deferred review findings, deliberate TODOs — into tracked follow-up work items in the team's tracker, linked to the source story, after approval. Supports Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Azure DevOps via adapters. Use at the end of a story, or when the user asks to track follow-ups.
Fetch a work item (summary, status, description, acceptance criteria, comments) from the team's issue tracker and display a clean summary. Supports Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Azure DevOps via adapters. Use whenever a prompt contains an issue reference (e.g. PROJ-1234, ENG-42,
Update the work item after delivery - comment the PR link and a product-facing summary, and transition it to the team's review status. Supports Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Azure DevOps via adapters. Use right after a PR is created for a story, or when the user asks to update/move a ticket.
Turn an idea or description (in any format) into a well-formed backlog — epics, user stories with acceptance criteria, sub-tasks — and create it in the team's tracker after approval. Elaborates progressively (guided, the default) or in one shot (--quick). Supports Jira, Linear, GitHub Issues, and Azure DevOps via adapters. Use when a product owner wants to draft or create tickets from an idea, brief, or document.
Turn a spark (an idea, even a one-liner, in any format) into a clear product definition through a guided, Socratic discovery phase — frame the problem (users, outcome, metrics, constraints, non-goals), explore 2–4 directions with trade-offs, and produce an approved definition that then feeds plan-backlog. Facilitate, never decide. Use when a product owner wants to define a problem before breaking it into a backlog.
Structured review of a pull request or the current diff - correctness, contract drift, security, missing tests, coverage gate - producing classified findings and a verdict. Use when the user asks to review a PR or diff, or as the self-review step of the story workflow.
Work a user story end to end — fetch the ticket, plan (with approval), implement, verify the applicable gates, self-review, open the PR, and update the tracker. Use when given an issue key like PROJ-1234, ENG-42, or