nisavid/tricritical

Use when Tricritical or external review findings need evidence-based acceptance, rejection, deferral, or follow-up classification without changing the reviewed candidate.

Use when reviewing a candidate for requirement fit, missing outcomes, scope, authority, acceptance criteria, or alternate user and operator perspectives.

Use when the user asks to review and revise a candidate until the current increment is done, or when an authority-gated fixed-point review cycle is explicitly required.

Use when a candidate needs an independent read-only review, a critic subset, or a synthesis of intent, runtime, and structure evidence without edits.

Use when accepted Tricritical findings must be integrated into a candidate under explicit original mutation authority and a bounded review scope.

Use when reviewing a candidate for runtime correctness, security, compatibility, failure paths, concurrency, operational behavior, or false verification.

Use when reviewing a candidate for needless complexity, duplication, weak ownership, boundary leaks, over-abstraction, or opportunities to delete and simplify.