scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.
- Version
- 1.5
- License
- MIT license
Pinned to revision 81e61470a785, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Files
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/agents/openai.yaml
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/common_biases.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/core_capabilities.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/evidence_hierarchy.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/experimental_design.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/logical_fallacies.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/review_sources.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/scientific_method.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/statistical_pitfalls.md
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.