code-review-and-quality
A reusable five-axis code-review workflow for PowerShell/DSC changes: review for design, correctness, complexity, tests, and clarity/naming; size changes to stay reviewable; label findings by severity (Blocker / Major / Minor / Nit); separate must-fix from opinion; and keep review turnaround fast. The bar is "would a senior engineer approve this?" USE FOR: code review, review this change, PR review, reviewer checklist, review standards, severity labels, nit vs blocker, change sizing, reviewable diff, what to look for in a review, approve or request changes, review feedback tone, self-review before pushing. DO NOT USE FOR: the multi-phase PowerShell security review with SARIF/CVSS (use the code-review prompt or the security-reviewer agent), agentic/LLM security review (use agent-security-review), adversarial critique of a design or document (use devils-advocate-review), multi-perspective document peer review (use the peer-review prompt).
Pinned to revision 7a186c5dfcf8, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Files
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.