scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluates scientific claims and evidence quality. Applies to experimental design validity, biases and confounders, statistical interpretation, evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), and teaching critical analysis. Supports evidence appraisal and identifying flaws; formal peer review writing belongs to peer-review.
- Version
- 1.5
- License
- MIT license
- Compatibility
- Analytical guidance needs no network. Optional figures via the scientific-schematics skill require OPENROUTER_API_KEY and outbound API access to OpenRouter.
Pinned to revision 68105dd992f1, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Pre-approved tools experimental
Experimental field. Support varies between clients, so this list is what the author declared, not what your client will enforce.
- Read
- Write
- Edit
Files
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL_CN.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/common_biases.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/core_capabilities.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/evidence_hierarchy.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/experimental_design.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/logical_fallacies.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/review_sources.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/scientific_method.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/statistical_pitfalls.md
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.