scientific-critical-thinking
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
- Version
- 1.3
- License
- MIT
- Compatibility
- Analytical guidance needs no network. Optional figures via the scientific-schematics skill require OPENROUTER_API_KEY and outbound API access to OpenRouter.
Pinned to revision df088027ff23, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Pre-approved tools experimental
Experimental field. Support varies between clients, so this list is what the author declared, not what your client will enforce.
- Read
- Write
- Edit
Files
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/SKILL.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/common_biases.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/core_capabilities.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/evidence_hierarchy.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/experimental_design.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/logical_fallacies.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/scientific_method.md
- skills/scientific-critical-thinking/references/statistical_pitfalls.md
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.