deriving-a-quality-contract
Derives a project-specific quality contract from three axes - risk profile, team maturity, and product surface - labelling each testing practice MUST, SHOULD, or COULD, then produces a PRESENT/PARTIAL/MISSING/WAIVED gap matrix with an ordered remediation plan. Use when a project has no agreed testing strategy, when a team argues about which practices are mandatory, when onboarding a legacy or inherited repository, when a quality strategy document has to be derived from evidence instead of opinion, or when someone asks "what testing should we actually be doing here".
Pinned to revision c4efc46815a7, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Files
- skills/deriving-a-quality-contract/SKILL.md
- skills/deriving-a-quality-contract/resources/approach-catalog.md
- skills/deriving-a-quality-contract/resources/contract-template.md
- skills/deriving-a-quality-contract/resources/detection-signals.md
- skills/deriving-a-quality-contract/resources/maturity-model.md
- skills/deriving-a-quality-contract/resources/profiles.md
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.