duo-score-credibility
Design a score, rating or level that outsiders will accept and insiders cannot game — adaptive item selection, item-bank size as a security property, per-user instances, anchoring to a published external standard, pool-local ratings, cram-proofing, calibrated free practice, anonymous recorded human review, and owning the wait and the result delivery. Use when the user says their score is being gamed or inflated, asks how few questions an assessment actually needs, wants a level or rating that employers and schools will trust, worries that a leaked question set invalidates everyone's results, asks whether to invent their own scale or map onto an existing one, wants to give practice or a free tier away without corrupting the measurement, or asks how to prove a number means what it claims.
- Version
- 2.0.0
- License
- MIT
Pinned to revision 78072c9528fb, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Files
- skills/duo-score-credibility/SKILL.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/a-large-item-bank-makes-leakage-structurally-irrelevant.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/a-rating-is-meaningful-only-inside-its-own-pool.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/anchor-to-an-external-published-standard.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/design-so-cramming-cannot-move-the-score.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/one-legible-number-plus-a-content-manifest.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/stop-presenting-items-that-tell-you-nothing.md
- skills/duo-score-credibility/references/unique-instance-per-user-as-a-security-property.md
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.