Skip to content

florianbuetow/resume

v0.1.1MIT

Build and review software engineering résumés from an evidence chain, not a template, in the manner of Richard Feynman and W. Edwards Deming. Applies the three-reader standard (parser, recruiter, engineering interviewer): every claim carries context, action, constraint, result, and ownership; every number is asked by what method; the person's contribution is separated from the system's. review judges a résumé in two phases (up to eight ranked questions, then re-score on the answers into a prediction and a fix list) and never emits an ATS score. build harvests accomplishments one at a time into a win log with provenance, writes five-part bullets, assembles a few coherent versions per role family, runs the two pre-apply tests, and sets up tracking. Subcommands: review, build.

GitHub
skills

review

Review a software engineering résumé or CV as an LLM judge in the manner of Richard Feynman and W. Edwards Deming, against The Serious CTO''s three-reader standard (parser, recruiter, engineering interviewer). Use when the user says "review my résumé", "review my CV", "judge this resume", "is my CV ready to send", "evaluate my resume for a <role>", "resume review", or invokes $resume:review. Tests every claim against the five-part evidence chain, asks for the provenance of every number, ranks the questions that would resolve the most uncertainty, stops for answers, then re-scores and delivers a prediction plus a fix list. Never emits an ATS-style score.

Read SKILL.md at the source

Pinned to revision 8dd1fdc0bd68, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.

Files

Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.