Skip to content
v0.1.1MIT

Build and review software engineering résumés from an evidence chain, not a template, in the manner of Richard Feynman and W. Edwards Deming. Applies the three-reader standard (parser, recruiter, engineering interviewer): every claim carries context, action, constraint, result, and ownership; every number is asked by what method; the person's contribution is separated from the system's. review judges a résumé in two phases (up to eight ranked questions, then re-score on the answers into a prediction and a fix list) and never emits an ATS score. build harvests accomplishments one at a time into a win log with provenance, writes five-part bullets, assembles a few coherent versions per role family, runs the two pre-apply tests, and sets up tracking. Subcommands: review, build.

build

Build a software engineering résumé interactively from an evidence chain, not a template. Use when the user says "build my résumé", "write my CV", "help me create a resume", "rewrite my résumé from scratch", "build the perfect resume", "turn my experience into résumé bullets", "start a win log", or invokes $resume:build. Harvests accomplishments one at a time into a win log with provenance, writes five-part bullets (context, action, constraint, result, ownership), assembles a few coherent versions by role family, runs the two pre-apply tests with the $resume:review judge, and sets up tracking. Never invents a metric.

Read SKILL.md at the source

Pinned to revision 8dd1fdc0bd68, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.

Files

Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.