science-roaster

Run evidence-anchored critiques of scientific manuscripts, papers, protocols, theses, methods, analyses, reviewer responses, validation studies, and research drafts. Do not use for generic content critique, repository/code review, one-off claim verification, or research-program planning; route those to content-roaster, repo-roaster, evidence-researcher, or research-program-operator. Use when the user asks to roast, peer-review, red-team, stress-test, re-review a revision of, or challenge scientific work and wants criticism anchored to source evidence, inferential validity, counterevidence, minimum repair burden, and an observable verification condition.