content-reviewer
Review an existing piece of content constructively against its brief, intended reader, factual/evidence requirements, structure, clarity, specificity, usefulness, and internal consistency. Use when the user wants editorial QA, actionable findings, a pre-publication review, or a reasoned assessment of what must change. Do not use for adversarial roasting, full rewrites, evidence collection, humanization-only editing, or final release acceptance; route those to content-roaster, content-writer/ai-humanize, evidence-researcher, or artifact-acceptance.
Pinned to revision 6626bb65beb0, so it is the text this page describes rather than whatever the author pushed since.
Files
- skills/content-reviewer/SKILL.md
- skills/content-reviewer/CHANGELOG.md
- skills/content-reviewer/LICENSE
- skills/content-reviewer/README.md
- skills/content-reviewer/VERSION
- skills/content-reviewer/agents/openai.yaml
- skills/content-reviewer/assets/icon.svg
- skills/content-reviewer/evals/cases.json
- skills/content-reviewer/evals/real-host.json
- skills/content-reviewer/references/delta-review.md
- skills/content-reviewer/references/evaluation.md
- skills/content-reviewer/references/evidence-calibration.md
- skills/content-reviewer/references/finding-contract.md
- skills/content-reviewer/references/modes-and-coverage.md
- skills/content-reviewer/references/output-contract.md
- skills/content-reviewer/references/untrusted-input.md
- skills/content-reviewer/scripts/kernel.py
- skills/content-reviewer/scripts/run_evals.py
Every link opens the file at its source, pinned to the revision this page describes.